Our Work

Three real builds, shown in full.

De-identified, step by step, including what each one puts in front of a person. The decision logic between the data and the output is where the value hides, and it is the part a template would skip.

How to read these

These are working builds, de-identified so we can show you the inside. The steps and the outputs are the real ones. Internal reporting lands straight in your team's inbox; nothing reaches a client, or anyone outside the business, without a person approving it first.

Build 01 · Professional-services firm

A morning brief that tells the partners how the month is landing

Partners make pricing, resourcing and scope calls in the 10 to 12 day blind window after month-end, before the numbers are in.

Before10 to 12 days a month of pricing and resourcing calls made on instinct, waiting for the numbers to close.
NowA ranked 30-second brief in the inbox by 7am, every morning of the close window.
1
Schedule

Runs itself

Fires at 6:30am, daily through close, weekly otherwise.

2
Your systems

Pulls the data

Reads live P&L, cash, receivables, utilisation, WIP and margin.

3
Logic

Does the maths

Finds every variance and ranks it by dollars.

4
AI

Writes the brief

Turns the ranked numbers into a plain-English decision note.

5
Delivery

In the inbox by 7am

Phone-formatted, a 30-second read. No new dashboard.

1Runs itself

Fires at 6:30am, daily through the close window and weekly the rest of the month, so it never becomes noise people learn to ignore.

2Pulls the data

Reads live P&L, budget, bank position, receivables and bills due, plus utilisation, WIP and project margin, and the same window last month and last year for context.

3Does the maths

Works out every variance, flags what has moved outside its normal pattern, and ranks by what matters in dollars. If everything is notable, nothing is.

4Writes the brief

Turns the ranked numbers into a short, decision-flavoured note in plain English: what is landing, what is still rescuable, what is already locked in.

5In the inbox by 7am

Arrives before the partners are at their desks, formatted for a phone, a 30-second read. No new dashboard, nothing to log into.

A person stays in charge. The brief informs the decision, it does not make it. And it is built around your firm, not a template: on a call we change what the top line leads with and who it goes to, live, and run it again in front of you.
What actually lands in the inbox
Month-End Flash: Day 26
to: the partners · 6:52am

Month landing around 3% below forecast. Two live issues worth a look today.

Revenue and margin
  • Fees month-to-date tracking 3% under forecast. Driver is a slower close on the advisory pipeline, four engagements slipped to next month.
  • Project margin 31%, down from 34% last month. Two projects are dragging it.
Still rescuable this month
  • Project Garnet: 120% of budgeted hours used, scope expanded quietly in week 3. A reprice conversation this week recovers it. Next week, too late.
  • Project Larch: the senior associate is at 118%, the junior at 62%. Shift work down before Friday.
Already locked in
  • Write-off on Project Slate lands this month. Already actioned, no decision left.

It looks like a lot because it is. The scheduling, the ranking, the tone, the part between the raw numbers and a sentence a partner will act on, that is the build. It is also why a prompt box on its own will not get you here.

Build 02 · Civil infrastructure contractor · Agent

A clause-cited claim, drafted from a one-line brief

The same agent handles extension-of-time claims, variations, notices of delay and RFIs.

BeforeHours of careful drafting for every delay event, with someone reading the contract to find the governing clause.
NowA one-line brief in, a clause-cited claim out in under a minute, waiting on a person to approve it.
1
Brief intake

A one-line brief

A person describes the delay event in one sentence.

2
AI + memory

Reads the contract

Finds the qualifying cause and pins the governing clause.

3
Drafting

Writes the claim

Builds the clause-cited claim document in under a minute.

4
Your Drive

Owner-only delivery

Saved owner-only to your drive. It cannot send or lodge anything itself.

5
Sign-off

Asks before issue

Asks the owner to approve. It cannot decide to send.

1A one-line brief

A person describes the delay event in a sentence and hands it to the claim drafter. No forms, no template wrangling.

2Reads the contract

Reads the job facts and the stored contract, identifies the qualifying cause, and pins the exact governing clause it relies on.

3Writes the claim

Builds a branded, clause-cited claim document with the chronology, the entitlement basis and the attachments, in under a minute.

4Owner-only delivery

Saves it to your own drive, sharing hard-blocked in code, and returns a private link. It cannot send or lodge anything itself.

5Asks before issue

Ends with a plain-English summary and asks the owner to review and approve. The system can do the work, it cannot decide to send it.

Nothing is issued without a person. The agent drafts and delivers to the owner only. It flags its own assumptions in the document ("if the agreed cause differs, the entitlement basis should be revisited before issue") so the reviewer is checking real reasoning, not rubber-stamping a mail-merge.
The top of a drafted claim
Extension of Time Claim: EOT-008
contract: AS 4000-1997 · for internal review before issue

Claim summary

A formal claim for an extension of time under Clause 34.3 of the General Conditions, following the notice of delay issued under Clause 34.2.

Delay event
  • The primary lifting plant was rendered inoperable by an unplanned interruption to the site mains power. All crane-dependent works on the critical path were suspended.
Extension claimed
  • Four (4) working days, as time-only relief. Delay damages under Clause 34.9 are not claimed for this event unless the cause is later characterised as compensable.
Flagged for the reviewer
  • This assumes the outage originated outside the Contractor's plant. If the agreed cause differs, the entitlement basis should be revisited before issue.

The clause is the whole job. Anyone can generate a document. Reading the contract, choosing the right clause, and being honest about the assumption it rests on is the part that decides whether the claim survives scrutiny.

Build 03 · Any back office · Coordinator

One coordinator running a team of specialist agents

Instead of a single all-purpose bot, a coordinator runs a team of specialist workers; we first proved the pattern on a construction back office, here it is on everyday client admin.

BeforeA new client onboarding pack written by hand, then the CRM, the registers and the missing-document chase all done separately.
NowPack drafted, records updated and two missing documents flagged in about 40 seconds, held for sign-off.
1
Coordinator

Routes the work

Sends each request to the right specialist worker.

2
Model routing

Picks the model per job

Cheapest capable model for each task, no lock-in.

3
Specialists

Two workers, in parallel

Drafter builds the pack while the clerk updates records.

4
Shared memory

Hands work to each other

Workers pass tasks along, carrying shared memory across jobs.

5
Sign-off

Surfaces for approval

Nothing outbound ships without the owner signing off.

1Routes the work

Receives a request and sends it to the right specialist worker by type. One front door, a team behind it.

2Picks the model per job

Sets the cheapest capable model for each task, with no lock-in: a frontier model for the careful drafting, a cheap fast one for the clerk.

3Two workers, in parallel

The document drafter builds the client-facing pack while the records clerk updates the CRM and the internal registers.

4Hands work to each other

Workers pass tasks between them and carry shared memory of the account, prior documents and where things were left, across jobs.

5Surfaces for approval

Results come back on screen. Same rule as everything else: nothing outbound ships without the owner signing off.

The team is fast, the gate is human. The coordinator can route and run work across several agents at once, but the approval to send always sits with a person. Speed on the inside, control at the edge.
A task coming back through the coordinator
Task: New client onboarding pack
routed to 2 workers · done in ~40s
  • Return: welcome pack and engagement letter drafted and saved owner-only. Private link returned.
  • Summary: built from the account details and your standard terms, personalised to their scope.
  • Handoff to Records Clerk: new account created in the CRM, contacts and key dates logged. Two compliance documents flagged as still missing.
  • Awaiting owner sign-off before anything goes to the client.

This is the shape of the bigger builds. A coordinator, specialist agents, shared memory, and one human gate. It is how a back office scales without handing over the decisions that need a person.

Want one of these built around your work?

Book a strategy call and we will map the one build that would pay for itself first in your business.